All Activity

Yes, archviz is big market and getting the real time rendering tech on both Win and Mac is quite nice

Happy to say I prefer forum discussion much better than anything else. At very least bashing is delegated to very end of the topic 😄

Dear members and visitors, here you can find individual scene files built in tutorials on our YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/@CORE4D Please do note that these are available to subscribers only since subscriptions are what is making recording them possible. Thank you for your contribution! How to series 01_IsDynamic.c4d 02_Project_Spline.c4d 03_Find_Smallest_Largest_RS.c4d 04_Perpendicular_Vector.c4d 05_Trailing and Tracing.c4d 06_Relational_Scaling.c4d 07_Surface_Color_Transfer.c4d 08_Random_poly_colors.c4d 10_Vertex_Map_To_Selection.c4d 11_Grow_Vertex_Map.c4d 12_Particle Packing.c4d 14_Condition_Gate_RS.c4d 15_Particles_In_Volume.c4d Point modifier series 01_Spherify_Deformer_RS.c4d 02_Wave_Deformer_RS.c4d 03_Twist_Deformer_RS.c4d 04_Soft_Collider_RS.c4d 05_Smooth_Deformer_RS.c4d 07_Laplacian_Spline_Smooth_Deformer.c4d Projects 01_Spike_Bracelet_RS.c4d 02_Concertina_rig_RS.c4d 03_Sierpinski_Triangle_RS.c4d 04_Flocking_RS.c4d 05_Stacking_Objects_RS.c4d 06_Roll_Objects_RS.c4d 07_Differential_Line_Growth_RS.c4d 08_Burning_Match_RS.c4d 09_Plasma_Ball_RS.c4d 10_Trailing_RS.c4d 11_Boat_On_Water_RS.c4d 12_Butterfly_RS.c4d 13_spirit_level_RS.c4d 14_Particle_Powder_Explosion_RS.c4d 15_Laser_Printing_RS.c4d 16_Jiggle_RS.c4d 17_Koch_Snowflake_RS.c4d 18_Lava_Lamp_RS.c4d 20_Spiral_Phylotaxis_RS.c4d 23_Curl_Spline_RS.c4d 24_Softbody_Packing_Solver_RS.c4d

Yep, I prefer the forum days rather than Twitter or Reddit. I checked a couple of Reddit pages on all this and there were already people wanting to burn Maxon's house down, which seemed a bit harsh. I expect interesting times ahead too.

@BoganTW, I think we properly laid out Maxon's options – it will be interesting to sit on the sidelines and watch how things will unfold. Thank you for the discussion, this feels like internet from a more elegant and civilized age 🙂

New plastic did a whole series on Afro hairstyles, and it was absolutely brilliant ! He was using octane at the time, but a lot of it still applies. Here's the first one... CBR

Here is a curl spline setup, quite interesting! Curl_spline.c4d

Fair points, I think the Autograph UI looked fine btw. Maxon has all these Red Giant apps that put their hand up and ask for permission to send stuff over to AE, and maybe they can do it to Fusion, Nuke and whatever other compositing app you care to name. Fusion (though also available as standalone) sits under Resolve. Blender's integrated comping sits under Blender, Houdini's new compositing features sit within Houdini. Maxon makes a 3D app for creating stuff in 3D for comping, they make Red Giant plugins for grading and adding particles and doing further comping and FX, they have a renderer where you can make your 3D stuff look even better before you comp it, but it's all stuff that asks the user to eventually drag the results away into another app at the end. It's like Maxon have a variety of food trucks that make increasingly tasty meals, but they never invested in a restaurant where you can sit down and eat it. So, they sell a lot of apps - again, the Red Giant stuff - that ultimately need another non-Maxon app to really be useful. An umbrella app that gathered SuperComp and Magic Bullet and the like all together, with zero difficulty communicating with C4D, would have its own selling points for C4D users, and it wouldn't make Maxon One any less useful. There aren't a lot of fresh competitors to AE in the industry, as it take a lot of time and effort to build a brand new compositor. But - surprise! - the Left Angle guys just built one. A few (just a few) AE users under EJ's Twitter post on this topic said they had used Autograph, liked it, and one guy said it fixed a few pain points that had bugged him for years about AE. Autograph had received several feature updates since launch, so you'd figure the application was becoming useful for something. The Maxon press release has been carefully parsed by posters here and elsewhere, but the final line of the Maxon comment says much: "Stay tuned, we look forward to sharing more in the future about how we plan to use this technology for the benefit of the community. " The technology being referred to is the compositing application Left Angle built, the only way you can use a compositing application is to composite things in it, Maxon has a bunch of Red Giant plug ins built to be used in a compositor, and they now have a compositor-building team that just brought a finished compositing app into the Maxon building with them. At a certain point, there's not a lot of mystery about where all this is probably going.

Thanks man ! Appreciate that !

I love this character ! Nice and good job on that and keep it up too !!

I used to copy them directly from the Unicode manual... https://www.unicode.org/Public/16.0.0/charts/CodeCharts.pdf I found it very interesting as I was in to linguistics stuff and the information it provided were brief yet enough to search further on the internet.

It never works well with extreme Tension values. It will Always look a bit squished because it doesn't work similar to a Sweep. One way to do it the right way would be to use a Matrix, a Tracer and a Sweep but it will take time as you'll need to adjust many things to match the topology of the rest of the model. Start with the Matrix and create one on a Polygon Selection with the Distribution set to Polygon Center. Then Connect the two matrices with a Traced. Set Spline Type to Bezier. Make the tracer Editable and Put it under a Sweep with the appropriate spline for thickness. Adjust the tangents of the two ends of the rail spline to match the cups of the original model. Lastly adjust the Rotation of the Sweep from the Details moving all points the same height. This step has to be done last as any change to the Tangent orientation will mess everything up. Then you have to make the Sweep editable, connect it to the rest of the model and ... you guessed it, bridge the ends... or Weld with the Connect object if points are close enough to the patch. There is no one-click solution. This isn't recommended for many objects or procedural bridging. This should have been modeled as a spline from the beginning.

Hey Doug. It's a perfectly valid question, and one we have all wondered about at some time or other... 🙂 Open Charmap, directly from the Windows command prompt, and select the font you would like, and find the character(s) you need, then Select (that's how you can get multiple characters at same time) and Copy them (Ctrl-C), and paste (Ctrl-V) into Cinema's text field. Would be nice if Cinema could do that bit for us though, so might suggest it, although I can imagine the reasons they might give why that's not possible. CBR

Greetings everyone! As a noob, I am stumbling around trying to find my way ... so far, not being very successful - at least I have not been kicked off the forum, not yet anyway. I am having trouble getting ASCII characters to be accepted by the C4D Text Editor. I thought holding Alt while entering the four digit code would insert the character, but it does not seem to be working for me. If anyone can point me in the right direction, I would be most grateful. I apologize in advance for posing such a seemingly elementary issue, but for me it is significant. Please don't judge me to harshly. Thank you in advance for any assistance anyone can provide.

Can you manage the same trick with a cylinder? I can only get it to flatten in the middle.

zBrush was always the leading app in it's segment, acquiring that app was like getting a crown juwel into the portfolio. Autograph on the other side really is tainted with a first reception of being too expensive, too incomplete and too 'old' (referring to their UI/UX and marketing). In my view, the brand 'Autograph' has little clout, I'm sure they'll drop the name at least. The current app and tech? Well, that's a more complex question. You're right, to suddenly have an almost full-blown competitor to AfterEffects is attempting to wield against Adobe. Would Maxo dare, though? Right now they have strategic and sales-alliances like the MaxonOne+Substance bundles. I guess they actually make some bucks from those cooperations. So, what could Maxon gain if they sever the strategic alliance with Adobe and place an competitor? Not much, I guess, because comping land already is a crowded place. There's the AE-people with decades of AE-projects, -scripts, -plugins, - tutorials. That audience is deeply entrenched. The subset of people who are so pissed by AEs legacy cruft already have alternatives in Blackmagic's Fusion (priced very competitively), Blender's integrated comping (priced even more competitively), with even further options on each end... OpenSource Natron or Hi-End Nuke. What would be a 'Maxon Autograph's USP here? It would need to be better than 20 years of AE-development and better priced than free. Tough battle. On the other hand, it would make sense to port the RedGiant offerings not only to Resolve, but also to the rest of comping apps. Maybe the Leftangle-Team will just port stuff and deal with the comping workflows / tech environment of the other apps. Who knows. In the end, I actually hope you are right and we see a fresh new competitor for the Adobe behemoth, I just fail to see the dollars on that way 🙂

You can have Hair on Hair ! Dynamics are enabled only for the main strands. Main strands don't have a hair material. Secondary hair material has a high value of Kink(>200) It's very efficient and fast.

For me Surface mode bulges the connection... Normal Average worked for me for a smooth connection.

I don't intend on posting any more updates to the scripts here. I think it serves its purpose for me. This was just me sharing with you guys and maybe getting ideas for other ways us non-programmers can use AI to make small workflow scripts. I know Greyscalegorilla recently released a small script pack where Chad used AI to help write for him.

I wanted to move a lot of free Blender objects and scenes into C4D. I tried a free IO plugin on Gumroad which could copy/paste between Blender and C4D apparently using FBX. Many times the materials didn't have textures or were referencing ones that were misnamed in the conversion. I decided to try USD instead and it seemed to work better. Full scenes of objects w/materials came across including converted RS materials. While it wasn't perfect as any materials with transparency had that parameter lost in the process, it was better than straight FBX. I had ChatGPT then come up with a couple of scripts, one for Blender and the other for C4D. The one from blender would simply copy selected geo a temp USD file. In C4D, the script would copy that temp file into the existing scene. I eventually added to it to allow the Blender scene to unpack and write any textures to disk before exporting the USD. That's because some Blender scene files have their textures packed inside the file and it seemed like the USD export didn't grab them. Somewhere along the way with the rewrites I had it do, it decided to export the whole scene (incl cameras). I'm ok with that for now. I also had ChatGPT create an icon for the C4D script. I didn't do one for blender since the devs hate any real customization like putting custom buttons on the UI or other fun stuff (without coding it with serpens). I know you can add an icon in the addon but I hate the UX of the addon tabs anyways. Included below is the bundle. Install in blender as an addon. You'll find the addon in the addons tabs. Install in C4D as a script. Apply the icon to the script and place the script anywhere on the UI if you want. It asked if I wanted to create it as a plugin but I didn't go that route. NOTE: This is free. Do whatever with it. During the modifications of the scripts in ChatGPT I specifically told it I'm using Blender 4.4.3 and C4D 2025.2.1. I can't verify this will work on older/future versions of either software. It's the environment I'm using now so I built it as such. It does make me wonder if some of the old scripts/plugins could be reinvigorated w/GPT to make them work with newer versions of C4D. usd_io_blender and c4d.zip

Thanks Mash for your insight, You're right I just had a surface as emitter. I didn't have time to change the model so I improved it by adding a localized gravity field, telling the pyro sim to go downward on the ceiling instead of upward through the surface and it looked much better already. I will think of giving it thickness first if I run into such probs in another project !

You can generate various geometry types (including an instance if needed) using hair itself using generate tab. Check the attached simple example head_hair.c4d

I wanted to test out ChatGPT converting RS Standard Materials to OpenPBR. After 30 minutes of correcting it I gave up. I changed the Redshift_Material_ID to 5703 after it suggested I check the material ID through another script it created. I still couldn't get it to work. I ended up running out of my free credits. Is this functionality going to be in the next C4D 2025 update? I had submitted a request on Maxon's site but it goes into the void. It did mention one thing: If Maxon exposes official Redshift Python API for 2025+, it might become possible, but as of now, it’s limited. ChatGPT called out Maxon? This was one of the versions it created. The first iteration actually had a section for specific texture inputs: transfer_texture(rs_material, "diffuse_color", openpbr_node, "base_color") transfer_texture(rs_material, "refl_roughness", openpbr_node, "roughness") transfer_texture(rs_material, "bump_input", openpbr_node, "normal") ---------------------------------------------------------- import c4d REDSHIFT_MATERIAL_ID = 1036229 # Redshift material type ID (adjust if needed) OPENPBR_MATERIAL_ID = 1036227 # OpenPBR material type ID (adjust if needed) # The node ID string to identify Redshift node graph — you may need to adjust this based on your scene/plugins REDSHIFT_NODESPACE_STR = "com.redshift3d.redshift3dnodegraph" def find_nodegraph_by_id(root_node, id_string): """ Recursively search nodes starting from root_node to find nodegraph by ID string """ if not root_node: return None # Check current node's type ID string if root_node.GetTypeName() == id_string: return root_node # Recursively check children for i in range(root_node.GetDownCount()): child = root_node.GetDown(i) found = find_nodegraph_by_id(child, id_string) if found: return found return None def convert_redshift_to_openpbr(): doc = c4d.documents.GetActiveDocument() mats = doc.GetMaterials() changed = False for mat in mats: print(f"Checking material: {mat.GetName()}") # Check if this is a Redshift material if mat.GetType() != REDSHIFT_MATERIAL_ID: print(" - Not a Redshift material, skipping.") continue # Get Node Material reference nodemat = mat.GetNodeMaterialReference() if not nodemat: print(" - No node material found.") continue # Get root node root_node = nodemat.GetRootNode() if not root_node: print(" - No root node found.") continue # Find Redshift node graph inside root node by ID string rs_graph = find_nodegraph_by_id(root_node, REDSHIFT_NODESPACE_STR) if not rs_graph: print(" - No Redshift node graph found.") continue # Here you would copy or remap the textures/nodes from Redshift graph to OpenPBR graph # For demo, just create a new OpenPBR material and replace the old material in document print(" - Creating new OpenPBR material.") new_mat = c4d.BaseMaterial(OPENPBR_MATERIAL_ID) new_mat.SetName(mat.GetName() + "_OpenPBR") # Insert new material doc.InsertMaterial(new_mat) # Optional: Transfer textures/connections here if possible # Replace material in objects (simplified example) for obj in doc.GetObjects(): if obj.GetMaterial() == mat: obj.SetMaterial(new_mat) # Remove old Redshift material (optional) doc.RemoveMaterial(mat) changed = True print(f" - Converted material: {mat.GetName()} to {new_mat.GetName()}") if changed: c4d.EventAdd() print("Conversion complete, scene updated.") else: print("No Redshift materials found to convert.") if __name__ == "__main__": convert_redshift_to_openpbr()

Indeed it did, and if we change the mode to Surface as well we even get the curvature we need automatically ! Looks like those specific settings evaded me when I first tried ! CBR

Autograph isn't tainted, just like ZBrush wasn't tainted, but Maxon dropped the name Pixologic and I expect them to drop the name Left Angle. They could easily dump the name Autograph as well though. I guess. One of Autograph's most recent touted features was the ability to import AE files and replicate whatever was going there in Autograph, barring various plug-ins. Maxon are heavily invested in AE plug-ins but it wouldn't hurt to make them all Autograph compatible, and to tell some newcomers, yeah you could sub to Adobe if you want, but Autograph (or whatever the new name is) has most of that stuff now, works 100% with our Red Giant and C4D stuff, and you don't need a second subscription, just ours. Would this make them more bucks, or less? RedGiant already has RedGiant staff working on RedGiant comping plugins, do they need more people doing the same? The Left Angle guys just spent three years invested in doing something different to AE, rather than just making AE plugins (which would have been easier) in a compositor similar to AE but conceived as fresher and hopefully with a more ambitious road map. Should they now (a) dump all that work getting away from AE and go back to making AE plugins, or (b) keep on trying to do the new stuff they were doing when Maxon bought them. More to the point, which of those two options do you think they want to do? If Maxon just wanted to buy all the Left Angle staff and have them do Red Giant plugins, there wouldn't have been much need to put out a press release with the word 'Autograph' in the headline, and a big fat screenshot of the Autograph app at the top of the page. So Left Angle has gone the way of the dodo, but I think the chances of Autograph coming back in some fresh rebranded form are a fair bit higher. Possibly the name will change totally, the UI will get the Maxon treatment. If the 'something new' is something with a timeline, an object browser, a compositing window, various generators and text tools and so on, it'd be daft to make all that a plug-in inside AE rather than presenting the whole lot, tidied up, as a new app hopefully presenting a competitive alternative. The few Autograph threads on the AE Reddit page (there were a handful) all said "Please give us an alternative to AE, it's such a crashy POS". Then when I do my annual ritual of checking the official AE forums, the posts there under most updates read "Has this app become even worse? This is the crashiest version in years." There is room for an alternative. McGravran was previously the director of engineering for After Effects, and the Left Angle guys had heavily planned to make a modern AE competitor, and neither of them seem lazy or unambitious. The next 12 months will be interesting.