Leaderboard
-
in all areas
- All areas
- Videos
- Video Comments
- Files
- File Comments
- File Reviews
- Pipelines Tools
- Pipeline Tool Comments
- Pipeline Tool Reviews
- Databases
- Database Comments
- Database Reviews
- Plugins
- Plugin Comments
- Plugin Reviews
- Images
- Image Comments
- Image Reviews
- Albums
- Album Comments
- Album Reviews
- Topics
- Posts
- Blog Entries
- Blog Comments
- Status Updates
- Status Replies
-
Week
-
All time
May 3 2016 - March 19 2024
-
Year
March 19 2023 - March 19 2024
-
Month
February 19 2024 - March 19 2024
-
Week
March 12 2024 - March 19 2024
-
Today
March 19 2024
- Custom Date
-
All time
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation since 03/12/2024 in all areas
-
Well, you won't believe this. When trying some of the ideas you suggested, I got the spinning wheel of death. Might have come out of it, but after 5 min., I forced-quit. Now, I still had r19 open. Many models sold online are build with Max and provided in a couple of formats such as r11. I have r19 so I can open and save a scene to open in newer versions. Anyway, I thought, what the hell. I opened the same scene in r19. Broken textures as expected. I brought up the old Texture Manager, which for me anyway, used to be super slow to load fully. It loaded instantly and I tried Relink Assets and BOOM! It fixed all the links properly in 3 seconds. I reopened the scene in r25 and all is well. I have my workaround, but not explanation as to why the scene cannot be fixed in r25.2 points
-
This is a very unwise move and it will kill Cinema 4D in the long run. No students = no future users. Cinema 4D is already dead in a lot of Universities and Colleges in the US. The absurd price and all the shenanigans with the student license made it a non-starter for most schools. Although this price hike won't change much the situation, because what happened last semester (Maxon canceling the student licenses MID SEMESTER!!!) already killed any good will schools had with the software. This is just the nail in the coffin. Keep in mind that Blender is not the competition here. Even though most of my students come to my classes (I teach around a hundred students per semester in a high ranked Animation program in the US) with Blender experience they are really interested in learning the industry standard software. And Maya student licenses are free and super easy to get. And after graduating they will have Maya Indie for U$305 bucks only. Meanwhile, Cinema4D charges a stupid high price for the student license, takes forever to get said license and has no indie version for former students. Considering this, Cinema4D is simply not an option anymore. Unfortunately, I understand why @DMcGavranis doing this. Even though this will kill Cinema4D in the long run, schools and students will keep paying for the Maxon One Student licenses not because Cinema4D but because Zbrush and, in some cases, Redshift. Zbrush is really the 3D cash-cow for Maxon now. Zbrush simply has no competition in the industry. 3D schools are hostage of Maxon in this case. And Redshift is the choice of schools without big budgets (like State schools) who need a faster renderer for students using Maya. It's cheaper to use Redshift than buying more powerful desktops or building a renderfarm for Arnold. And Octane's (the only other option) implementation in Maya sucks, while Redshift is super well integrated. Anyway, in the end I just feel really sad because Cinema4D is my favorite 3D software. It's pretty sad to see it going the way of Lightwave 3D.2 points
-
Attribute Transfer SOP. It won't be perfect because your topology is wildly different, but it might be close enough to do the job:2 points
-
2 points
-
Paul established a US-based entity for Maxon, to serve North and South America and introduced Cinema 4D to The Americas in 1998, His initiatives included strategic partnerships with industry-leading production studios and design firms, along with orchestrating product bundles with Adobe After Effects and Apple Final Cut Pro. Paul's leadership and strategic planning played a pivotal role in Maxon's unprecedented growth. Today, Cinema 4D stands out as one of the fastest-growing and widely-used 3D products for digital content creation. He takes pride in being part of a team that facilitated the emergence of 3D in the motion graphics industry. In 2016, Paul was honored with the Studio Daily 50 award, recognizing influential creatives and technologists. Known for his creative energy, customer service advocacy, and support for training and education, Paul is often invited to speak at industry events, particularly on the subject of motion graphics. Describe yourself in a single word Enabler (the good kind 🙂 ) How did you get into C4D/ Maxon and 3D in general? In the early 90’s I got my first job in the 3D industry – marketing managerfor ElectricImage (a 3D animation product on Mac). This was in the early days of 3D. I was there for a few years (learned a lot about the industry, artists and studios). They were purchased by the company Play (wellknown for the Snappy). Play was formed by former marketing people from Newtek. I was pretty sure my position was redundant, so, I went back into freelance marketing. Maxon started out as one of those freelance jobs. Which area interests you most? Facilitating, inspiring, motivating and helping creatives be successful in achieving their vision. What other apps are you using and what for? I assume this question is more geared towards artists. How about I tell you one of the things I find really interesting out there? I think Rive (https://rive.app/) is an extremely innovative and unique new offering and a significant breakthrough in the creation of real time vector graphics. At its core, Rive is a new graphics format. Rive graphics are not just static; they can be animated, interactive, and functional. The format and its players are open source so designers can create interactive content forproducts, apps, websites, and games - and Rive runs anywhere (web,iOS, Android, Windows, Unreal, Unity, C++, etc.). A huge advantage is how greatly it speeds up workflow by reducing designer-developer handoff. Which learning resources you used and would recommend? This forum of course, Cineversity, of course! School of Motion, Linkedin Learning, and YouTube/Google searches for anything useful. Do you think talent is overrated and can be offset with a lot of hard work? I’ve always felt there were two types of 3D animators and digital artists ingeneral - those who are naturally artistic and less technical, and those who are more technical with less artistic background. We used to call it right and left brained, (but I’ve recently read some scientists call that a fallacy). And there are those amazing exceptions – the people who seem to have both artistic “talent” and an innate understanding of technology. Talent is an intrinsic skill (as in something that comes natural to you). But it is a skill. So yes, I do think those not born with it can develop artistic sensibility. Your best advice for newcomers, tip or trick to pick up regarding marketing and industry? Create. Even with talent, nothing comes without practice and execution. Create what you love, what inspires you. Be inspired by others. Inspire others. Thoughts on AI? Artists worrying about how AI is going to affect the industry and their careers is completely understandable. But it cannot be ignored. It’s here and it’s not going away. The best thing to do is figure out how it canultimately serve and empower you. Part of being a creative professional is adapting to what is thrown at you, whether it be a client’s desires or technology advancements. Top 3 wishes for C4D a. That it will continue to humbly serve the artistic community. b. That it will continue to innovate and impact the industry. c. That it will be remembered as having a positive impact on the industry and secure a place in design history. Message for Core4D Stay positive, stay passionate and keep the community spirit. Tell us something we could not possibly know about you but you find important or funny : ) In my early 20’s I was an actor. I did mostly stage musicals, but I did doone film. I was a pirate in the movie Hook. I was also in the Hook Coke commercial – like everything else it can still be found on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUIAPbXevaA For fun, I still perform in a band with my buddy and my daughter https://thelaurelcanyonband.com/ Plans after a long journey with Maxon? Clear my head, look out into the horizon of the industry and get a good idea of what’s happening in the industry and where it’s going. Hopefully, I will find something where I can focus my passion and energy. Yes, I am actually looking for a job (it’s been rumored I am retiring – no way!! I have too much energy left.) – hopefully, it will besomewhere in the industry. This industry is my family. Also, some exciting news. Just this week I joined the advisory board for Rive. It’s not a job. I took an advisory position for a product I think has a tremendous amount of potential in the interactive design industry. I encourage everyone to check it out. Really innovative and fun. If people want to contact you https://www.linkedin.com/in/paulbabb/1 point
-
hehe, looks cute. obviously that must mean gravity XD really love some of ui features they've added, like this little cutie that pops up when using commander: makes using cinema4d pleasent :31 point
-
Someone's had fun designing the new icons, check the cool little apple logo in the Object manager.1 point
-
Dave's retweet five days earlier, the statue melting, also looked like particles, maybe. But this is all cool and I'm glad new tech is finally coming into C4D after a length of time I never want to think about again.1 point
-
Did you even read what I wrote? I specifically wrote that Blender IS NOT the Cinema4D competition here. Maya is. Maya is free for students, the student license is given without hassle (while Maxon treats students as criminals and takes forever), Maya has WAY more features than Cinema4D (it's not even close), Maya is a industry standard in more industries than Cinema4D, and Maya has a cheaper indie version for the students after they graduate (U$305 if you make less than $100.000 annually). The only advantage of Cinema4D is that is easier to learn and used to have a better UI (not the case anymore). This is not enough for the ridiculous price difference, mistreatment of students (every semester my students tell me horror stories of Maxon cancelling or denying their licenses. This never happens with Autodesk software) and lack of a cheap professional version post-graduation (the indie version)1 point
-
How weird! And annoying. What happens if you use Find and replace at the bottom if that window instead of relink? Copy the breadcrumb trail from the bad link up to the folder with the textures and paste that into find and put your good breadcrumb link into replace. If it works on one, then you can select the whole list and do it in one go. Can't see why that would make a difference, but try it out. 🤔1 point
-
well, that's just sad... I understand this type of pricing for indie license but student licensing? pretty lame... even autodesk gives free student license if you verify. I guess for maxon verification isn't enough.1 point
-
It's making the rounds again on Reddit and Discord. The number of responses with "blender" is pretty interesting. Maxon is making money now but setting up the next generation of artists and the studios they will open or supervise with Blender,1 point
-
pm request, spline morphing : ) There is some help from delay effector to add secondary motion 224_Spline_morph.c4d1 point
-
Well we made it boys! C4D on the cover of 3D world magazine ! Was commissioned back in January to create a character for the cover , and an article with an over view of the modelling process. Brief was -Disco Astro naught, so I went with it, was changed quite a bit over the length of the process but quite happy how it ended up. This marks a significant miles stone for me as an artist, definitely something cool about seeing your work published!1 point
-
DigitalArtDeathmatch Now accepting artwork submissions for the DigitalArtDeathmatch at BeepleStudios with beeple!!! Submit your artwork for a chance to be featured at the event or compete in a LIVE digital art tournament at the event!!! https://beeple-studios.xyz/event/digital-art-deathmatch/1 point
-
1 point
-
To my opinion some of the models were unnecessarily too high in polygon count... I could feel the renderer slowing down when those objects where in view. Especially the candle if SSS was used.1 point
-
Ephere Ornatrix Hair Fur & Feather plugin: Review/Preview Part 1. In part one we will take a in depth look at this plugin and why you may use this over Cinema 4D built in solution. Cinema 4D own solution is robust, stable and very capable, but if you want to take things a step further Ornatrix is the way to go.1 point
-
Hi. You can convert Ornatrix hair to guides. You can either keep the amount of hairs needed to populate the whole area, or reduce the amount in the viewport so fewer guides are made, but then your using the interpolation of C4D to produce the hair so it will vary a bit from Ornatrix interpolation. 1: Add curves from strands after Hair from guides operator 2: Press export spline. 3: Select spline and chose from the C4D hair tools Convert from spline. 4: Add the Hair mesh or selection set in the Hair objects Guides Link. 5: In the C4D hair tools select Set Roots and apply. PS: I will be making a video on this, as this has not been covered, so look out for that later on today. Dan1 point
-
Thats a good question, and your right there should be a good reason to justify a plugging in which is aimed at a feature set C4D has. I will address this in more detail in the video. What I can say on a simplified level for now is Ornatrix takes off where C4D hair system end in its abilities. This is mainly around control over particular guides, hair groups, its consistent interpolation methods, and its powerful modular approach. Modular: In C4D you have a single material with one set of attributes that change the outcome of the hair, these are called Operators within Ornatrix, lets take Frizz as an example. You can make and apply a map to control how much is applied and to where in C4D native hair system. This is also true with Ornatrix but things can taken much further. Due to Ornatrix modular methods you can apply as many operators as you wish in any order. A frizz operator is applied to the operator stack. like C4D it applies to the the entire hair. You may want one type of frizz on the top of the head, and another type on the sides. The only way to do this in C4D is to make multiple hair objects to have multiple materials. In ornatrix you can simply select the top of the hair guides, make it into a group, invert the selection make the group for the sides. Add two frizz operators and apply one to one group, and one to the other. No texture maps needed. What if within the settings of the frizz you wanted some hairs to receive more frizz not just the full length but just at the tips of the length? This can not be done in C4D, its all or nothing. You can use texture maps for the entire length in C4D but not on a per vertex level. With Ornatrix not only can you assign a group such as the top of the hair only, but within that group you can assign particular guides to receive more or less frizz, again no texture maps needed. These are called channels and can be painted with a vertex brush directly on the guides, or flood filled either as a value between 0 = Back to 1 White and all values between. You can make as many Channels as you wish either on a per strand basis or a per vertex basis. If you use a per strand basis the assigned value applies to the whole guide. A value of 1 would get 100% frizz, 0.5 = 50% all the way down to 0 no frizz at all. If you make a channel on a vertex basis you can brush with the vertex brush tool any value you wish down the length of the guide. This lets you apply frizz right at the tips for example. Not only do you get this additional control but no texture maps are needed. You can have has many frizz operators as you wish, this applies to all operators in which some operators gives you control on not just the amount but other attributes. Clumping: Clumping is essential to get realistic looking hair or fur, C4D clumping abilities are not only limited but very hard to use. In reality there are multiple layers of clumping from larger clumps to very fine layers. C4D only allows you to add one layer. With Ornatrix you can add multiple clump operators each one can take the last into account to further split larger clumps into smaller ones. You can again choose a group of guides, and particular channels for individual guides. Where Ornatrix takes things to a whole level higher is you can choose individual hairs and clump them, or remove clumping, or edit individual clump sets. You have so much control over clumping that C4D does not. Direct Hair grooming: You can make your groom using guides, add multiple operators to fine tune it, then actually groom the hair directly. This means you can use all the brushes directly on the hair itself. Bake operators to your guides: You can force certain operators to be baked to the actual guides, this means you can remove them operators which makes simulations for example faster. Remember you can apply operators to both the hairs or directly to the guides. Interpolation: The interpolation for how the the hair responds to the guides is essential for a good outcome. C4D is lacking in this area. Ornatrix really shines here. Some styles need different interpolations and Ornatrix gets you so close to the style your making with the guides. Other mentions: The Surface Come tool lets you draw arrows in the direction you wish the hair to flow. v2 has made this even better but C4D does not have this feature. This is especially useful for animals, but can be used on human hair. Push Away From Surface will push your hair away from the head, this is a one click fix for intersections. It works and works well. You have further operators to help add additional details such as more verts to certain strands, smoothing, collision prevention. You can save hair styles for later use, export for Unreal. These are just a few things to mention. The outcome is that you get the hair under control spot on to how you want it. Dan1 point
-
They get all of Maxon One for that hundred bucks, including all the Red Giant stuff, Redshift, ZBrush and whatever else gets chucked in there. And I actually do see the logic of it as a business decision. Clearly less people will be signing up to this higher price than before. The people that do sign up will be paying higher than before. Those people will probably also be more keen on sticking with C4D and using it as a career, versus the percentage (I won't say 'handful' as it could be many) of people who wanted to test the waters, were half interested, but view the hundred bucks as an obstacle. So they go away, Maxon has less work to deal with managing it, and they probably still kinda / sorta make the same dollars. I could be wrong. Dave can pop in here with a big spreadsheet showing earnings and interest and projections if anyone really wants to get into the dollar logic of why they put the price up. When I sub again it won't be at the educational rate so in a number of ways I don't really care about this. There are a few references to Blender in that Reddit thread but I would frankly view it as newsworthy if a C4D comments thread pops up anywhere online without at least three guys telling us how wonderful Blender is. Blender is pretty cool, and I have this on a lot of authority because the past five years of scrolling C4D threads everywhere have usually carried a handful of folks giving one sentence comments or five words or even just two words mentioning Blender, like "There's always Blender...." "You could always use Blender..." "Or, there's Blender..." "Blender is free!" and so on. This was all useful info the first time I heard it but is maybe less effective reading it the 5000th time, but this is just me. And I do think Blender is cool. But it's very janky and even the non-janky bits sit tightly alongside the bits that are janky, all of it managed and sorted out by a particularly janky Object manager. The Reddit thread does have a quite fair comment from a teacher who noted, in NZ a lot of the kids at the school where he teaches are poor and $100 is a week's groceries. This is fair enough and if he's going to learn and then teach them all Blender, I guess they'll all be learning Blender. If this is a good thing for everyone I'm not sure what the problem is. People say we live in a world of dramatic exciting change with AI and new free software apps and entire industries changing, and who knows where we will be in five years etc etc? In reality I know exactly where we will be in five years, threads will still be bubbling along at a low rate with some folks expressing satisfaction and some dissatisfaction at whatever Maxon has just done, every online comments thread here and on Youtube and elsewhere will have another five to ten guys writing "There's always Blender..", "You could just use Blender", "Maybe it's time for Blender?", and this will be the state of affairs for the rest of our lives, with neither Maxon nor the excitable Blender fans ever changing.-2 points